• Home
  • About
  • PTSD
  • Homeless Veterans
  • Contact
  • Voice of the Veteran
  • Blog

LowVARates.com is not affiliated with any government agencies, including the VA, FHA, or the HUD. VA lender ID #9797520000. Not intended for Washington state residents.

Protect Our Troops
  • Home
  • About
  • PTSD
  • Homeless Veterans
  • Contact
  • Voice of the Veteran
  • Blog
The Disaster of Military Uniforms

The Disaster of Military Uniforms

Posted by Bill Howard |

During my time in the military, I’ve seen lots of changes with the uniforms from each branch. When I started in the Army, we wore the old BDUs and the green dress uniforms.

The Air Force jumped on the bandwagon when the Army lost their bet and they let them wear the ACUs as well. In combat, one of the first things you’re taught is that cover and concealment will keep you alive. Well let’s face it, the only place you’re concealed in the ACUs is a white, gardening-rock, flower bed.

The Marines soon followed suit with the digital uniforms after the Army did. The Navy on the other hand, gave their sailors a nice blue uniform so they could hide in water, or better yet, couldn’t be seen in the water if they needed to be rescued. Who lost that bet?

Chaos in the Navy

When I started in the Navy, we wore those hideous dungarees. No wonder the Navy wouldn’t allow sailors to be seen off base in them! Those had to be the most embarrassing uniforms ever worn by any member of the United States Armed Forces. Why the Navy ever let sailors wear that, somebody must’ve lost a serious bet.

Good thing now is they’re getting rid of it soon and they’re going to have all sailors wearing the green camo. After years of arguing, the Army will finally have all their soldiers in the multicam uniform by the end of 2018. I’m not sure what the Air Force will decide. They’ll probably wait and rent another branch’s uniform since they’ve done that with the multicam since 2005.

The branch I feel bad for is the Navy. You can’t even count how many uniforms they’ve had, let alone determining whether it’s a dress uniform or a working uniform.

Give Them Something They’re Proud to Wear

For me it kinda goes back to keeping it simple. For combat branches (i.e. the Marine corps and the Army), a uniform with superior concealment should be worn as the daily uniform. Have one dress uniform.

For most of the other branches, have them wear a uniform that best suits their MOS. Meaning, if they work in HR, they should be in some type of business uniform. And there still needs to be a separation of what each branch wears so we can tell them apart.

However, let’s not complicate the uniform like the Navy does. Let’s give each service member a uniform whether it be dress or field, but make it something they can be proud to wear.

 

  • Author
  • Recent Posts
Bill Howard
Bill Howard
William "Bill" Howard is both a Wounded Warrior and a writer for Low VA Rates. Before beginning his career with LVR, Bill served in both the Navy (1988-1993) and Army (2005-present). In the Navy, he was part of Special Boat Unit 11, and he served as an E-7 sergeant first class, Explosive Ordnance Disposal (EOD) Specialist, and a Ranger while in the Army.
Bill Howard
Latest posts by Bill Howard (see all)
  • What’s Missing in Today’s Military: Integrity - March 20, 2018
  • What’s Missing in Today’s Military: Honor - March 19, 2018
  • Veterans without Care: What’s Wrong with the VA? - December 18, 2017
1
Share
Advertisment

Related Pages

  • Homeless Veterans
  • PTSD
  • Voice of the Veteran

Like Us

Contact Us

We're currently offline. Send us an email and we'll get back to you, asap.

Send Message

Contact Info

  • Low VA Rates
  • 384 S 400 W #100, Lindon, UT 84042
  • 866-569-8272
  • contact@lowvarates.com
  • lowvarates.com

Recent Posts

  • What’s Missing in Today’s Military: Integrity
  • What’s Missing in Today’s Military: Honor
  • Veterans without Care: What’s Wrong with the VA?
  • The M240: A Reliable Weapon for Infantry
  • Who’s the Real Enemy?

© 2025 · Protectourtroops.org. Is A Low VA Rates, LLC™ website. All Rights Reserved. Low VA Rates, LLC is not affiliated with any U.S. Government Agency nor do we represent any of them. Corporate Address: 384 South 400 West, Suite 100, Lindon, UT 84042, 801-341-7000. VA ID 979752000 FHA ID 00206 Alaska Mortgage Broker/Lender License No. AK-1109426; Arizona Mortgage Banker License #0926340; Licensed by the Department of Financial Protection and Innovation under the California Finance Lenders Act License #603L038; Licensed by the Delaware State Banking Commission License #018115; Georgia Residential Mortgage Licensee License #40217; Illinois Residential Mortgage License #MB.6761021; Licensed by the New Jersey Department of Banking and Insurance, Ohio Mortgage Loan Act Certificate of Registration #SM.501937.000; Oregon Mortgage Lending License # ML-5266; Rhode Island Licensed Mortgage Lender License #20143026LL; Texas License LOCATED at 201 S Lakeline Blvd., Ste 901, Cedar Park, TX 78613; EAH061020 Click on these links to access our Privacy Policy and our Licensing Information. Consumer NMLS Access - NMLS #1109426.
By refinancing the consumer’s existing loan, the consumer's total finance charges may be higher over the life of the loan.

All Rights Reserved. We are not affiliated with any government agencies, including the VA, FHA, or the HUD. All our approved lenders are authorized VA , FHA and or Fannie Mae or Freddie Mac approved.

  • Privacy
Prev Next